diff --git a/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc b/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc
index a74f9e57..2b48af13 100644
--- a/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc
+++ b/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc
@@ -245,9 +245,12 @@ GTEST_API_ ThreadLocal<Sequence*> g_gmock_implicit_sequence;
 // Reports an uninteresting call (whose description is in msg) in the
 // manner specified by 'reaction'.
 void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const string& msg) {
+  // Include a stack trace only if --gmock_verbose=info is specified.
+  const int stack_frames_to_skip =
+      GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) == kInfoVerbosity ? 3 : -1;
   switch (reaction) {
     case kAllow:
-      Log(kInfo, msg, 3);
+      Log(kInfo, msg, stack_frames_to_skip);
       break;
     case kWarn:
       Log(kWarning,
@@ -256,8 +259,8 @@ void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const string& msg) {
           "call should not happen.  Do not suppress it by blindly adding "
           "an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call.  "
           "See http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#"
-          "Knowing_When_to_Expect for details.",
-          3);
+          "Knowing_When_to_Expect for details.\n",
+          stack_frames_to_skip);
       break;
     default:  // FAIL
       Expect(false, NULL, -1, msg);
diff --git a/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc b/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc
index b8f7a11d..342c22f5 100644
--- a/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc
+++ b/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ using testing::Gt;
 using testing::InSequence;
 using testing::Invoke;
 using testing::InvokeWithoutArgs;
+using testing::IsNotSubstring;
 using testing::IsSubstring;
 using testing::Lt;
 using testing::Message;
@@ -1977,9 +1978,25 @@ class VerboseFlagPreservingFixture : public testing::Test {
 #if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION
 
 // Tests that an uninteresting mock function call on a naggy mock
-// generates a warning containing the stack trace.
+// generates a warning without the stack trace when
+// --gmock_verbose=warning is specified.
 TEST(FunctionCallMessageTest,
-     UninterestingCallOnNaggyMockGeneratesFyiWithStackTrace) {
+     UninterestingCallOnNaggyMockGeneratesNoStackTraceWhenVerboseWarning) {
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = kWarningVerbosity;
+  NaggyMock<MockC> c;
+  CaptureStdout();
+  c.VoidMethod(false, 5, "Hi", NULL, Printable(), Unprintable());
+  const std::string output = GetCapturedStdout();
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsSubstring, "GMOCK WARNING", output);
+  EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT2(IsNotSubstring, "Stack trace:", output);
+}
+
+// Tests that an uninteresting mock function call on a naggy mock
+// generates a warning containing the stack trace when
+// --gmock_verbose=info is specified.
+TEST(FunctionCallMessageTest,
+     UninterestingCallOnNaggyMockGeneratesFyiWithStackTraceWhenVerboseInfo) {
+  GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = kInfoVerbosity;
   NaggyMock<MockC> c;
   CaptureStdout();
   c.VoidMethod(false, 5, "Hi", NULL, Printable(), Unprintable());
@@ -2112,8 +2129,7 @@ class GMockVerboseFlagTest : public VerboseFlagPreservingFixture {
         "\nGMOCK WARNING:\n"
         "Uninteresting mock function call - returning directly.\n"
         "    Function call: DoA(5)\n" +
-        note +
-        "\nStack trace:\n",
+        note,
         "DoA");
 
     // A non-void-returning function.
@@ -2126,8 +2142,7 @@ class GMockVerboseFlagTest : public VerboseFlagPreservingFixture {
         "Uninteresting mock function call - returning default value.\n"
         "    Function call: Binary(2, 1)\n"
         "          Returns: false\n" +
-        note +
-        "\nStack trace:\n",
+        note,
         "Binary");
   }
 };
diff --git a/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt b/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt
index b6b2d349..650a8f07 100644
--- a/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt
+++ b/test/gmock_output_test_golden.txt
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ Uninteresting mock function call - returning default value.
     Function call: Bar2(0, 1)
           Returns: false
 NOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this call should not happen.  Do not suppress it by blindly adding an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call.  See http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#Knowing_When_to_Expect for details.
-Stack trace:
 [       OK ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCall
 [ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCallToVoidFunction
 
@@ -84,7 +83,6 @@ GMOCK WARNING:
 Uninteresting mock function call - returning directly.
     Function call: Bar3(0, 1)
 NOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this call should not happen.  Do not suppress it by blindly adding an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call.  See http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#Knowing_When_to_Expect for details.
-Stack trace:
 [       OK ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCallToVoidFunction
 [ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.RetiredExpectation
 unknown file: Failure
@@ -269,7 +267,6 @@ FILE:#:
     Function call: Bar2(2, 2)
           Returns: true
 NOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this call should not happen.  Do not suppress it by blindly adding an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call.  See http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#Knowing_When_to_Expect for details.
-Stack trace:
 
 GMOCK WARNING:
 Uninteresting mock function call - taking default action specified at:
@@ -277,7 +274,6 @@ FILE:#:
     Function call: Bar2(1, 1)
           Returns: false
 NOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this call should not happen.  Do not suppress it by blindly adding an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call.  See http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#Knowing_When_to_Expect for details.
-Stack trace:
 [       OK ] GMockOutputTest.UninterestingCallWithDefaultAction
 [ RUN      ] GMockOutputTest.ExplicitActionsRunOutWithDefaultAction