Merge pull request #1719 from happyCoder92/master
docs: fix broken links
This commit is contained in:
commit
b46b86ee60
|
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
Now that you have read the [googletest Primer](primer) and learned how to write
|
||||
Now that you have read the [googletest Primer](primer.md) and learned how to write
|
||||
tests using googletest, it's time to learn some new tricks. This document will
|
||||
show you more assertions as well as how to construct complex failure messages,
|
||||
propagate fatal failures, reuse and speed up your test fixtures, and use various
|
||||
|
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ c is 10
|
|||
>
|
||||
> 1. If you see a compiler error "no matching function to call" when using
|
||||
> `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*`, please see
|
||||
> [this](faq#OverloadedPredicate) for how to resolve it.
|
||||
> [this](faq.md#OverloadedPredicate) for how to resolve it.
|
||||
> 1. Currently we only provide predicate assertions of arity <= 5. If you need
|
||||
> a higher-arity assertion, let [us](https://github.com/google/googletest/issues) know.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -707,8 +707,9 @@ In general, the recommended way to cause the code to behave differently under
|
|||
test is [Dependency Injection](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection). You can inject
|
||||
different functionality from the test and from the production code. Since your
|
||||
production code doesn't link in the for-test logic at all (the
|
||||
[`testonly`](http://go/testonly) attribute for BUILD targets helps to ensure
|
||||
that), there is no danger in accidentally running it.
|
||||
[`testonly`](https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/be/common-definitions.html#common.testonly)
|
||||
attribute for BUILD targets helps to ensure that), there is no danger in
|
||||
accidentally running it.
|
||||
|
||||
However, if you *really*, *really*, *really* have no choice, and if you follow
|
||||
the rule of ending your test program names with `_test`, you can use the
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user